Surfaces
T1

Provenance & Intent

1.1
Interaction design

Cryptographic content provenance

The agency signs each document at the moment it arrives, so the record proves the submission was unaltered after receipt without claiming who wrote it.

User submitting
City Digital ServicesConsultation: Foreshore managed retreat plan

Submission received

Reference FMR-2026-00090.

We’ve signed and timestamped your files.

Receipt signature
Received14 Jun 2026, 09:42Signed byCity Digital Services platformSubmitterL. Nguyen · government digital ID verifiedStateBoth files unaltered since receipt

This records when we received your files and that no one has altered them since. It does not verify who originally wrote them.

Your documents
lot-elevation-survey.pdf
214 KB
Content Credentials
Captured in Acme Scanner 4.2 · 11 Jun 2026
Cropped and exported — 2 edits, no content added
Signed by City on receipt · 14 Jun 2026, 09:42
submission-letter.docx
38 KB · no embedded credentials
Signed at intake
System shows signal
lot-elevation-survey.pdf
Intact since 09:42. Full creation chain present: captured, lightly edited, no content added.
submission-letter.docx
Intact since 09:42. No pre-receipt history.

Most files that arrive this way never had a credential. The unsigned file is weighted no lower for lacking one.

1.2
Interaction design

Verifiable credentials and decentralized identity

An independently attested identity sits beside a preparation-method declaration the submitter makes themselves, so a reader can tell which claim is vouched for.

User sharing credentials
City Digital ServicesStep 3 of 4 · Strengthen your submission

Strengthen your submission

Both parts below are optional. You can prove who you are, and tell us how you prepared this. Your submission is accepted either way.

Verified
Verified identity

From your digital wallet. Only what this consultation needs is shared.

Ready to sharedigital ID wallet
Over 18
Resident of the City
Registered engineer · professional licensing board
Name and address · not shared
Self-declared
How you prepared this

Bound to your verified identity, but not separately checked. It is accepted as stated.

Your declaration
Drafted by me, from my own experience
Translated with AI translation software from Vietnamese
Submitted on my own behalf, not an organization
Prefer not to identify yourself?
No identity or declaration will be attached.
System shows claims
Verified: registered engineer, City resident, over 18.
Issuer-verified · name withheld
Self-declared: drafted personally, AI-translated.
Declared by the submitter · bound to identity

Verified input and self-declared input are shown as two labeled signals. Anonymous input is never discounted without the user being told.

1.3
Interaction design

Self-attestation and disclosure

Disclosure opens as a single default for the common case, and asks for the tool, the version, and the extent only from submitters who used AI assistance.

04 / 05How you prepared this

Did you use any tools to prepare your submission?

No further detail needed. You can continue.
1.4
Interaction design

Proof of personhood at submission

Personhood is treated as a gradient, attaching a visible assurance tier to each submission rather than forcing a single submit-or-don't checkpoint.

User confirming personhood
City Digital Services

Confirm a person is behind this

This consultation asks for at least phone verification. Pick any method that meets or exceeds it, or submit without one.

EmailPhone · required minimumGovernment ID

Your submission will show the signal “Phone-verified” to the analysts who read it.

System shows signal
Submissions · Foreshore managed retreat plan4,213 received
FMR-2026-0090L. NguyenID-verified
FMR-2026-0187AnonymousPhone-verified
FMR-2026-0203AnonymousEmail-verified
FMR-2026-0561AnonymousNot established

Every submission shows its signal, including “not established”, which means accepted and weighted for review, never dropped. The weighting applied to each tier is published, and the signal is never color alone.

1.5
Interaction design

Structured intake with process metadata

Sectioned intake fields gather how a submission was built as a byproduct of writing it, never as a gate the submitter has to clear.

User submitting
City Digital ServicesWrite your response

We record how this form is filled in: timing and paste events, not what your words say.

Your situation

I’ve lived on Riverside Terrace for eleven years and use the sidewalk daily with a mobility scooter.

Your views on the proposalWriting now

The levy is fair in principle, but the proposed flat rate ignores that some streets were resurfaced only last year. A tiered charge based on the age of each segment would…

This text was pasted from another source. Note where it came from?
Your recommendationsUp next
Prefer to write freely? Switch to a single box. It counts the same, with less detail captured about how you wrote it.
System logs audit trail
Process metadata
session23 min, returned twicetyped : pasted78% typed · 22% pastedsectionscompleted in orderedits41 revisionspaste_events1source un-noted

No content is analyzed, only how the submission was built. A free-text submission has less of this.

1.6
Interaction design

Linking a person's input to the final text

Showing your working is offered as a voluntary norm rather than enforced, so a submitter who chooses the plain declaration pays no extra steps.

Preview the submission with or without annotations
City Digital Services · Consultation submission05 / 05

Review and submit

Check your submission below. Showing your working is optional. You can submit as soon as you’re ready.

Your submission · Coastal Precinct Plan

The proposed levy will fall hardest on long-term residents on fixed incomes. My pension has not moved in two years, and an added charge of this size is not something I can absorb.

Source: Riverside Tenants' position paper

I would support the plan if the foreshore path were kept step-free the whole way. As a wheelchair user, the current route is the only one I can take to the shops.

How this was written, in your words
3 sessions
Drafted over the week
Some pasted
From my own notes
One rewrite
After the second section

Described by you, not recorded by the system. Included with your submission only if you choose to share it.

The plain declaration sits first, and selecting it is an affirmative act: Submit stays inactive until a declaration is made. Showing your working is never required to submit.

‘Add a source’ and the provenance notes work with a keyboard and a screen reader, and skipping them adds no extra steps. Nothing in the interface suggests that a missing note is suspicious.

1.7
Interaction design

The attestation-verification gap

The declaration is made binding after the fact rather than verified up front, tying each submission to an identity and scaling the consequence to what the process decides.

Preview the declaration at a different stakes level
City Digital Services · Submission declaration
This is a public comment on a minor change. Only a short declaration is needed.

How was this prepared?

Most people tell us how their submission was prepared.

Sign as
Your name
Sign with the name you give us.

The two ways to sign are drawn as peers: same size, same weight, no badge or check marking the verified path as better.

The verified-identity slot appears only in the formal proceeding, where it is wired but inactive: labeled for a verified government digital ID and marked unavailable. There the binding declaration must be checked before signing. The control above previews that version.